Dear Harriet,
I was really hoping to see the party use this summer to get back to campaigning, defending our record and making the case for a fourth term - reasons why we set up Go Fourth.
After a couple of months where we saw certain sections of the Parliamentary Labour Party questioning leadership and cabinet walk outs, I was looking forward to seeing us put it all behind us and getting back on the front foot again.
Building Britain's Future - Labour spelling out what it will do to get us out of this economic downturn and build a stronger, fairer and more prosperous country - was warmly welcomed by all of us who want to see the party stay in power to continue the good fight for jobs and social justice.
So I read with real sadness your interview with the Sunday Times today.
The headline on the front page said 'Harman: You Can't Trust Men In Power' whilst inside another headline read 'Look Out Boys, I'm in Charge Now.'
I know you don't choose the headlines. But you did choose the words in the interview.
You said: "I don't agree with all male leaderships. Men cannot be left to run things on their own. I think it's thoroughly bad to have a men-only leadership."
Quotes like this just raise leadership issues once again just at a time when we should all be pullng together and defending our record.
We created two million jobs, made massive investments in health and education that vastly improved these frontline services, met and surpassed our Kyoto targets and are leading the way in securing an historic global climate change deal in Copenhagen.
And under Gordon Brown's leadership, we're leading this country and the world out of a global recession when it's clear the Tories would have done absolutely nothing.
These successes came out of a strong governement of men and women working together.
Success doesn't come from saying all male leaderships are bad and trying to change the party rules to ban all male leaderships. This would change one member one vote - which John Smith and I fought very hard to introduce - to one man, one woman, one vote for leadership elections.
Why take away from the party the right to choose its leaders on the basis of ability? You can't dictate equality in leadership elections. You must let the party decide.
I was beaten fair and square in the 1992 deputy leadership election by Margaret Beckett.
You yourself beat four men to become deputy leader in 2007.
In theory you were elected on merit, not your gender. The system works and I think we should keep it that way.
You had a great opportunity today to use the Sunday Times and the Andrew Marr show as platforms to campaign, sell back our successes and spell out Labour's forward agenda.
This is crucial, now more than ever, after a disasterous June election campaign you were supposed to be running and with a poll today saying we're 24% behind the Tories in the key marginals that you're supposed to be in charge of campaigning in.
Let's talk about what we've done, and are doing, for jobs, social justice, health, education and, yes, equality.
So, as I've said to others before, stop complaining and get campaigning.
I'll save you a seat on my battle bus!
Love,
JP



Delicious
Digg
Reddit
Facebook
StumbleUpon
Time to pack in?
I recall you making a face about Gordon Brown's YouTube vid . . . Harriet is right to stress Labour's natural inclination to bring women to leadership, which, in the current situation, is not least of our selling points.
Kiss and make up now.
3£Billion profit how much did you want.
Thats not soiled nappies!
I do agree with Harriet that there are still gross gender inequalities. You must must must accept that for the public, especially myself as a young woman growing up with a huge interest in Labour politics, it is incredibly disheartening to see the politics so dominated by men. Whilst it is true that you relate to politicians based on what they say and do, it makes it so much easier to see politicians as regular human beings when they are more representative.
When we are in the worst recession since the 1930s, facing the lights going off on windless days it shows how petty she & many other cabinet members are when they are concerned only about fixing the rules for personal advancement rather than "leading the world out of recession" (true only if we don't count China, India etc since they were never in it) or even having any policy issues of interest to real people to disagree about.
Edward Mayes- I would hope all Labour members have a "chip on their shoulder" about equality. We live in a horribly inequitable society and if people like Harriet won't stand up and say it, no one will
John- If you want to see what happens when men only control a work environment, look at the casino style, testosterone filled banking system that just collapsed. The fact the vast majority of traders were men and ridiculous risks were taken isn't unconnected. Balanced workplaces are better for everyone.
"The system works and I think we should keep it that way." Women are a majority of the population but have a minority of the representation at every level. They also suffer far greater levels of poverty.
For people who think the system is working; have a look at the countries doing better than us at representing women in their legislatures.
United Arab Emirates, Uganda, Angola, Pakistan and Eritrea to name but a few.
http://www.ipu.org/wmn-e/classif.htm
Labour members agreeing with you here should be ashamed. We're better than this.
Equity is about when you can reveal your income in terms of the Inland Revenue. We have seen lots of un- equitable claims for expenses at National and local government level and the black economy survives because of this.
I am available to be on the Panel of candidates for the labour party if they want to re-instate it otherwise I will be doing the democratic alternative.
Subject to no project 2000 restrictions imposed by non-equitable !
Ask our Eric in Barnsley he knows.
It sounds like he doesn't understand what 'equality' should be aiming to achieve. Much like Miss Harman, Diane Abbott and many, many others.
I have never believed in positive discrimination in order to balance up gender inequalities. Encourage good candidates to come forward and I would hope they would get selected, irrespective of their gender.
Harriet is chasing goals that nature has shown women are not cut out for some leadership roles.
Sometimes its like putting a square peg in a round hole.
Stefanomics who interviewed Harriet on BBC this AM would make a far leader!
I am not being sexist just expressing my opinion from experience of life and my wife earns more than me!